KRISHNA KARMAKAR vs AVIJIT KARMAKAR — 314/2025

Case under Hindu Marriage Act Section 13,(B). Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED IN TERMS OF COMPROMISE on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

Matrimonial Suit

CNR: WBBK050006372025

Filing Number

354/2025

Filing Date

28-Aug-2025

Registration No

314/2025

Registration Date

28-Aug-2025

Court

Additional District Judge, Bishnupur, Bankura

Judge

19-Addl District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DECREED IN TERMS OF COMPROMISE

Last updated 01-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Hindu Marriage Act Section 13,(B)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KRISHNA KARMAKAR

    Adv. Md. Nasiruddin Khan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AVIJIT KARMAKAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Copy of DecreeView PDF

    The Additional District Judge granted a decree of divorce by mutual consent between Smt. Krishna Karmakar and Sri Avijit Karmakar under Section 13(B) of the Hindu Marriage Act, dissolving their marriage solemnized on 06.01.2015 with immediate effect. The court found that both parties had completed the statutory 6-month cooling-off period, failed reconciliation attempts, lived separately since 01.01.2016, and proved their case with no collusion between them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Addl District and Sessions Judge

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Daily OrdersView PDF

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Put Up

    Addl District and Sessions Judge

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Daily OrdersView PDF

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 28-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 314/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional District Judge granted a decree of divorce by mutual consent between Smt. Krishna Karmakar and Sri Avijit Karmakar under Section 13(B) of the Hindu Marriage Act, dissolving their marriage solemnized on 06.01.2015 with immediate effect. The court found that both parties had completed the statutory 6-month cooling-off period, failed reconciliation attempts, lived separately since 01.01.2016, and proved their case with no collusion between them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case