MOIDUL ISLAM MONDAL vs MOSATTARA ALIAS MOSABBAR MONDAL AND STATE OF WEST BENGAL — 14/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438. Status: Steps. Next hearing: 29th April 2026.

Steps Next hearing 29-Apr-2026 this date has passed

Criminal Revision

CNR: WBBK050005712025

Filing Number

282/2025

Filing Date

31-Jul-2025

Registration No

14/2025

Registration Date

31-Jul-2025

Court

Additional District Judge, Bishnupur, Bankura

Judge

19-Addl District and Sessions Judge

Last updated 21-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438
Code of Criminal Procedure Section 397

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MOIDUL ISLAM MONDAL

    Adv. Joydeep Raha.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MOSATTARA ALIAS MOSABBAR MONDAL AND STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Case History

  1. 29-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Daily OrdersView PDF

    Case Adjourned In Criminal Revision No. 14 of 2025, the court adjourned the case to 29-04-2026 for filing a certified copy of the impugned order. No substantive order was passed today, as the regular Presiding Officer is on Supreme Court-directed SIR duty, and the local Bar Association had requested that no adverse order be passed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Steps

    Addl District and Sessions Judge

  4. 13-Jan-2026

    Daily OrdersView PDF

  5. 13-Jan-2026

    Steps

    Addl District and Sessions Judge

  6. 19-Nov-2025

    Daily OrdersView PDF

  7. 19-Nov-2025

    Steps

    Addl District and Sessions Judge

  8. 29-Aug-2025

    Daily OrdersView PDF

  9. 29-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 31-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 14/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Adjourned In Criminal Revision No. 14 of 2025, the court adjourned the case to 29-04-2026 for filing a certified copy of the impugned order. No substantive order was passed today, as the regular Presiding Officer is on Supreme Court-directed SIR duty, and the local Bar Association had requested that no adverse order be passed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case