09( vs Jadav Majhi Advocate - Prasenjit Nandi — 70/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498A,302,304B,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 24th April 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: WBBK050003772022
Filing Number
186/2022
Filing Date
08-06-2022
Registration No
70/2022
Registration Date
08-06-2022
Court
Additional District Judge, Bishnupur, Bankura
Judge
19-Addl District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
24th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
234
Police Station
BISHNUPUR
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
09(
22 STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Adv. APP Bishnupur
Respondent(s)
Jadav Majhi Advocate - Prasenjit Nandi
Madhab Majhi
Adv. Tanmoy Ghatak
Gopal Majhi
Adv. Tanmoy Ghatak
Mira Majhi
Adv. Tanmoy Ghatak
Lakhi Santra @ Riya
Adv. Tanmoy Ghatak
Hearing History
Judge: 19-Addl District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Judgement
Argument / Further Argument
Argument / Further Argument
Argument / Further Argument
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-04-2026 | Judgement |
| 31-03-2026 | Argument / Further Argument |
| 18-03-2026 | Argument / Further Argument |
| 12-03-2026 | Argument / Further Argument |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of West Bengal v. Jadav Majhi & Others (Case 70/2022) Court Decision: All four accused persons (Jadav Majhi, Madhab Majhi, Mira Majhi, and Laxmi Santra @ Riya) were acquitted of charges under IPC sections 498A/302/304B/34 on April 24, 2026. Key Reasoning: The court found the prosecution's evidence insufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. While the postmortem confirmed the victim (Rama Majhi) died from homicidal head injury, most witnesses provided only hearsay evidence. The sole claimed eyewitness (PW7) lacked credibility as her account contradicted the hostile witness PW11 (Abha Majhi), who was present at the scene but gave no incriminating testimony despite being cross-examined. The court determined no reliable evidence established the accused's culpability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: State of West Bengal v. Jadav Majhi & Others (Case 70/2022) Court Decision: All four accused persons (Jadav Majhi, Madhab Majhi, Mira Majhi, and Laxmi Santra @ Riya) were acquitted of charges under IPC sections 498A/302/304B/34 on April 24, 2026. Key Reasoning: The court found the prosecution's evidence insufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. While the postmortem confirmed the victim (Rama Majhi) died from homicidal head injury, most witnesses provided only hearsay evidence. The sole claimed eyewitness (PW7) lacked credibility as her account contradicted the hostile witness PW11 (Abha Majhi), who was present at the scene but gave no incriminating testimony despite being cross-examined. The court determined no reliable evidence established the accused's culpability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts