Dilip Sardar vs Tata AIG Gen. Insurance Co. Ltd — 175/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Status: Steps. Next hearing: 30th June 2026.

Steps Next hearing 30-Jun-2026 this date has passed

M A C C - M.A.C.C

CNR: WBBK010027392025

Filing Number

1596/2025

Filing Date

10-Nov-2025

Registration No

175/2025

Registration Date

10-Nov-2025

Court

Disrtrict and Sessions Judge, Bankura

Judge

1-District Judge

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Dilip Sardar

    Adv. Rajesh Das

  2. 2.Sasthi Sardar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Tata AIG Gen. Insurance Co. Ltd

  2. 2.Nityandanda Hazra

Case History

  1. 30-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 20-May-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case 175/2025 Summary: In this Motor Accident Claims Tribunal case before the Bankura District Judge, the petitioners (Dilip Sardar and Sasthi Sardar) filed a petition requesting time to complete procedural requisites and file the Detailed Claim Form (D.C.F). The court allowed the petitioner's prayer for extension and adjourned the case to 30-06-2026 for filing the D.C.F and taking proper steps upon the Objection Petitions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-May-2026

    Steps

    District Judge

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

  5. 27-Apr-2026

    Steps

    District Judge

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Steps

    District Judge

  8. 13-Jan-2026

    OrderView PDF

  9. 13-Jan-2026

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    District Judge

  10. 10-Nov-2025

    OrderView PDF

  11. 10-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 10-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 175/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case 175/2025 Summary: In this Motor Accident Claims Tribunal case before the Bankura District Judge, the petitioners (Dilip Sardar and Sasthi Sardar) filed a petition requesting time to complete procedural requisites and file the Detailed Claim Form (D.C.F). The court allowed the petitioner's prayer for extension and adjourned the case to 30-06-2026 for filing the D.C.F and taking proper steps upon the Objection Petitions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case