Prasanta Das Mahanto alias Prasanta Mahanta vs State of West - Bengal — 222/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th April 2026.
Criminal Misc.
CNR: WBBK010006392026
Filing Number
403/2026
Filing Date
18-Mar-2026
Registration No
222/2026
Registration Date
18-Mar-2026
Court
Disrtrict and Sessions Judge, Bankura
Judge
1-District Judge
Decision Date
09-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 21-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
21
Police Station
SIMLAPAL
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Prasanta Das Mahanto alias Prasanta Mahanta
Adv. ATANU DEY
-
2.Ajit Das Mahanta alias Ajit Kumar Mahanta
-
3.Purnima Das Mahanta alias Purnima Mahanta
-
4.Kalpana Das Mahanta alias Kalpana Mahanta
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of West - Bengal
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: 222/2026 The Sessions Judge, Bankura granted anticipatory bail to the three accused (Prasanta Das Mahanto, Ajit Das Mahanta, and Purnima Das Mahanta) in a case involving charges under BNS sections 329(4), 126(2), 117(2), 118(2), 110, 74, 351(3), and 3(5). The court found the FIR's credibility weakened due to unexplained delay of nearly one month in lodging it, and noted that most accused were female or senior citizens, concluding custodial detention was unnecessary. Bail was granted on condition of furnishing Rs. 4,000 bond with sureties, cooperation with investigation, and surrender within 15 days for regular bail consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Apr-2026
Disposed
District Judge
-
30-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
-
30-Mar-2026
Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition
District Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 222/2026
Case Summary: 222/2026 The Sessions Judge, Bankura granted anticipatory bail to the three accused (Prasanta Das Mahanto, Ajit Das Mahanta, and Purnima Das Mahanta) in a case involving charges under BNS sections 329(4), 126(2), 117(2), 118(2), 110, 74, 351(3), and 3(5). The court found the FIR's credibility weakened due to unexplained delay of nearly one month in lodging it, and noted that most accused were female or senior citizens, concluding custodial detention was unnecessary. Bail was granted on condition of furnishing Rs. 4,000 bond with sureties, cooperation with investigation, and surrender within 15 days for regular bail consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts