Arup Khan vs State of West - Bengal — 217/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 27th March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBBK010006302026

Filing Number

396/2026

Filing Date

18-Mar-2026

Registration No

217/2026

Registration Date

18-Mar-2026

Court

Disrtrict and Sessions Judge, Bankura

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

27-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

74

Police Station

JOYPUR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Arup Khan

    Adv. Swapan Mukherjee

  2. 2.Tumpa Khan

  3. 3.Durgabala Khan

  4. 4.Sanatan Khan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of West - Bengal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Bankura Sessions Court partially allowed the anticipatory bail application filed by four accused persons. The court rejected anticipatory bail for Arup Khan, finding serious allegations against him—specifically that he inflicted injuries on vital body parts of the complainant (a cancer patient) requiring hospitalization. However, the court granted anticipatory bail to the other three petitioners (Tumpa Khan, Durgabala Khan, and Sanatan Khan), noting that allegations against them were general in nature and considering their status as females and an elderly person, subject to furnishing bonds of Rs. 4,000 each with sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 217/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bankura Sessions Court partially allowed the anticipatory bail application filed by four accused persons. The court rejected anticipatory bail for Arup Khan, finding serious allegations against him—specifically that he inflicted injuries on vital body parts of the complainant (a cancer patient) requiring hospitalization. However, the court granted anticipatory bail to the other three petitioners (Tumpa Khan, Durgabala Khan, and Sanatan Khan), noting that allegations against them were general in nature and considering their status as females and an elderly person, subject to furnishing bonds of Rs. 4,000 each with sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case