Biswajit alias Suman Mondal vs State of West - Bengal — 204/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBBK010005702026

Filing Number

366/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

204/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

Disrtrict and Sessions Judge, Bankura

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

189

Police Station

BARJORA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Biswajit alias Suman Mondal

    Adv. Suvajit Thakur

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of West - Bengal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 204/2026 - Biswajit alias Suman Mondal v. State of West Bengal The Sessions Judge, Bankura granted anticipatory bail to accused Biswajit Mondal in connection with a case under Section 140(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. After examining the victim's statements and medical evidence, the court found that custodial interrogation was unnecessary. Bail was allowed on condition of furnishing a bond of Rs. 4,000 with two sureties of Rs. 2,000 each, with the accused required to surrender before the Chief Judicial Magistrate within 20 days for regular bail consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 204/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 204/2026 - Biswajit alias Suman Mondal v. State of West Bengal The Sessions Judge, Bankura granted anticipatory bail to accused Biswajit Mondal in connection with a case under Section 140(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. After examining the victim's statements and medical evidence, the court found that custodial interrogation was unnecessary. Bail was allowed on condition of furnishing a bond of Rs. 4,000 with two sureties of Rs. 2,000 each, with the accused required to surrender before the Chief Judicial Magistrate within 20 days for regular bail consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case