Umesh Chowdhury alias Hania alias Shuvo vs State of West - Bengal — 201/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 31st March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBBK010005422026

Filing Number

347/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

201/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

Disrtrict and Sessions Judge, Bankura

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

31-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

28

Police Station

BARJORA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Umesh Chowdhury alias Hania alias Shuvo

    Adv. Maheswar Das

  2. 2.Radheshyam Mahato alias Sonu

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of West - Bengal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 31-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The Sessions Judge, Bankura granted interim bail to two accused (Umesh Chowdhury and Radheshyam Mahato) in a criminal case under BNS sections 310(4)/310(5)/111/112/61(2)/3(5). The court found that both had been in custody since February 6, 2026, investigation was substantially complete, and search/seizure operations were finished, justifying bail. Each accused must furnish a bond of Rs. 4,000 with two registered sureties of Rs. 2,000 each and comply with conditions including cooperation in investigation and non-absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 31-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 19-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  5. 19-Mar-2026

    Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition

    District Judge

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 201/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sessions Judge, Bankura granted interim bail to two accused (Umesh Chowdhury and Radheshyam Mahato) in a criminal case under BNS sections 310(4)/310(5)/111/112/61(2)/3(5). The court found that both had been in custody since February 6, 2026, investigation was substantially complete, and search/seizure operations were finished, justifying bail. Each accused must furnish a bond of Rs. 4,000 with two registered sureties of Rs. 2,000 each and comply with conditions including cooperation in investigation and non-absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case