Rimpa Koley (Sarkar) vs State of West - Bengal — 196/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 25th March 2026.
Criminal Misc.
CNR: WBBK010005342026
Filing Number
341/2026
Filing Date
09-Mar-2026
Registration No
196/2026
Registration Date
09-Mar-2026
Court
Disrtrict and Sessions Judge, Bankura
Judge
1-District Judge
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 21-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
390
Police Station
KOTULPUR
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Rimpa Koley (Sarkar)
Adv. Swapan Mukherjee
-
2.Dipak Koley
-
3.Jhuma Koley
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of West - Bengal
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary: The Sessions Judge, Bankura granted anticipatory bail to the two accused (Rimpa Koley and Dipak Koley) in a case involving charges under sections 108/351(2)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The court found no element of immediate instigation in the FIR and the medical report did not justify detention. The accused were ordered released on furnishing a bond of Rs. 4,000 each with sureties, and must surrender for regular bail within 15 days while cooperating with investigation and not tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Judge
-
19-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
-
19-Mar-2026
Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition
District Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 196/2026
Summary: The Sessions Judge, Bankura granted anticipatory bail to the two accused (Rimpa Koley and Dipak Koley) in a case involving charges under sections 108/351(2)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The court found no element of immediate instigation in the FIR and the medical report did not justify detention. The accused were ordered released on furnishing a bond of Rs. 4,000 each with sureties, and must surrender for regular bail within 15 days while cooperating with investigation and not tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts