Jagannath Dey vs State of West - Bengal — 193/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 08th April 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBBK010005312026

Filing Number

338/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

193/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

Disrtrict and Sessions Judge, Bankura

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

08-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 21-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

35

Police Station

BARJORA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Jagannath Dey

    Adv. ATANU DEY 1

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of West - Bengal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Sessions Judge, Bankura rejected the bail application of Jagannath Dey, accused of illegally felling trees from protected forest areas under sections 303(2) and 317(4) of the BNS. The court found that considerable stolen tree stumps were seized from the accused, who is a habitual offender with multiple similar allegations, and determined that his continued detention is necessary for investigating the criminal syndicate and apprehending the kingpin. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition

    District Judge

  6. 18-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  7. 18-Mar-2026

    Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition

    District Judge

  8. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 193/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Sessions Judge, Bankura rejected the bail application of Jagannath Dey, accused of illegally felling trees from protected forest areas under sections 303(2) and 317(4) of the BNS. The court found that considerable stolen tree stumps were seized from the accused, who is a habitual offender with multiple similar allegations, and determined that his continued detention is necessary for investigating the criminal syndicate and apprehending the kingpin. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case