Purnima Ray vs Hiraj Mallick — 32/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Status: Sr/Ad/Appearence. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.

Sr/Ad/Appearence Next hearing 28-Apr-2026 this date has passed

M A C C - M.A.C.C

CNR: WBBK010005162026

Filing Number

200/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

32/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

Disrtrict and Sessions Judge, Bankura

Judge

1-District Judge

Last updated 20-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Purnima Ray

    Adv. SUBHA SUNDAR GHOSH

  2. 2.Susmita Roy

  3. 3.Mallika Das

  4. 4.Rupsa Roy

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Hiraj Mallick

Case History

  1. 28-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary In Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bankura (MACC-32/2026), the court allowed the petitioners' application to file deficit court fees of Rs. 9,900/- before judgment pronouncement in their Rs. 10 lakh compensation claim against Hiraj Mallik under the M.V. Act. The case is adjourned to 28-04-2026 for settlement/reply and appearance, with petitioners directed to file postal receipt and tracking report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    District Judge

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 32/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary In Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bankura (MACC-32/2026), the court allowed the petitioners' application to file deficit court fees of Rs. 9,900/- before judgment pronouncement in their Rs. 10 lakh compensation claim against Hiraj Mallik under the M.V. Act. The case is adjourned to 28-04-2026 for settlement/reply and appearance, with petitioners directed to file postal receipt and tracking report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case