Joydeb Roy alias Sandip Roy vs State of West - Bengal — 189/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBBK010005132026

Filing Number

333/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

189/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

Disrtrict and Sessions Judge, Bankura

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 20-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Joydeb Roy alias Sandip Roy

    Adv. Ajay Chattopadhyay

  2. 2.Jayanta Lohar

  3. 3.Rajib Koley

  4. 4.Biswanath Senapati

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of West - Bengal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Sessions Judge, Bankura granted anticipatory bail to four accused persons charged under Section 46A(C) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (illegal liquor business) on the grounds that no incriminating materials were seized from their possession, only from an arrested co-accused. The bail was granted subject to stringent conditions including a bond of Rs. 4,000 with two sureties, surrender within 15 days for regular bail, meeting the investigating officer twice weekly, and strict prohibition from engaging in illegal liquor activities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 189/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge, Bankura granted anticipatory bail to four accused persons charged under Section 46A(C) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (illegal liquor business) on the grounds that no incriminating materials were seized from their possession, only from an arrested co-accused. The bail was granted subject to stringent conditions including a bond of Rs. 4,000 with two sureties, surrender within 15 days for regular bail, meeting the investigating officer twice weekly, and strict prohibition from engaging in illegal liquor activities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case