Biswanath Kumbhakar vs State of West - Bengal — 188/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBBK010005122026

Filing Number

332/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

188/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

Disrtrict and Sessions Judge, Bankura

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 20-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Biswanath Kumbhakar

    Adv. Anirban Banerjee

  2. 2.Sanjay Kumbhakar

  3. 3.Mrinmoy Kumbhakar

  4. 4.Amit Kumbhakar

  5. 5.Sourav Paramanik

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of West - Bengal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Bankura Sessions Court granted anticipatory bail to five accused persons (Biswanath Kumbhakar, Sanjay Kumbhakar, Mrinmoy Kumbhakar, Amit Kumbhakar, and Sourav Paramanik) in a case involving charges under BNS sections 126(2), 121(1), 132, 221, and 351(2). The court found that since the investigation was complete and charge sheet already filed, custodial interrogation was unnecessary, and allowed bail on conditions including furnishing bonds of Rs. 4,000 each with sureties and surrender before the Chief Judicial Magistrate within 15 days for regular bail consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 188/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bankura Sessions Court granted anticipatory bail to five accused persons (Biswanath Kumbhakar, Sanjay Kumbhakar, Mrinmoy Kumbhakar, Amit Kumbhakar, and Sourav Paramanik) in a case involving charges under BNS sections 126(2), 121(1), 132, 221, and 351(2). The court found that since the investigation was complete and charge sheet already filed, custodial interrogation was unnecessary, and allowed bail on conditions including furnishing bonds of Rs. 4,000 each with sureties and surrender before the Chief Judicial Magistrate within 15 days for regular bail consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case