Abdul Rahim Molla @ Pintu Molla vs State of West - Bengal — 169/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBBK010004632026

Filing Number

300/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

169/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

Disrtrict and Sessions Judge, Bankura

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

8

Police Station

SIMLAPAL

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Abdul Rahim Molla @ Pintu Molla

    Adv. ATANU DEY

  2. 2.Abdul Rasid Molla

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of West - Bengal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Sessions Court in Bankura granted anticipatory bail to Abdul Rahim Molla and Abdul Rasid Molla in connection with Simlapal P.S. Case No. 08/2026 under various sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The court found that custodial interrogation was not required since the accused cooperated in the investigation and complied with statutory notices. They were granted bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 4,000 each with two sureties of Rs. 2,000 each, with a condition to surrender before the ACJM, Khatra within 15 days for regular bail consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 169/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Court in Bankura granted anticipatory bail to Abdul Rahim Molla and Abdul Rasid Molla in connection with Simlapal P.S. Case No. 08/2026 under various sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The court found that custodial interrogation was not required since the accused cooperated in the investigation and complied with statutory notices. They were granted bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 4,000 each with two sureties of Rs. 2,000 each, with a condition to surrender before the ACJM, Khatra within 15 days for regular bail consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case