Anarul Hoque vs State of West - Bengal — 143/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBBK010003952026

Filing Number

255/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

143/2026

Registration Date

17-Feb-2026

Court

Disrtrict and Sessions Judge, Bankura

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

6

Police Station

PATRASAYER

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Anarul Hoque

    Adv. Sajal Kanti Datta

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of West - Bengal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Sessions Court, Bankura granted anticipatory bail to Anarul Hoque, the registered vehicle owner accused under BNS sections 303(2), 317(2)-(5) and MMDR Act Section 21. The court found no custodial interrogation necessary since the co-accused driver was already granted bail and the petitioner had no criminal antecedents, being implicated only on suspicion. Bail was allowed on condition of furnishing Rs. 4,000 bond with two sureties of Rs. 2,000 each, with requirements to cooperate with investigation and surrender within 15 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 27-Feb-2026

    OrderView PDF

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition

    District Judge

  6. 17-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 143/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Court, Bankura granted anticipatory bail to Anarul Hoque, the registered vehicle owner accused under BNS sections 303(2), 317(2)-(5) and MMDR Act Section 21. The court found no custodial interrogation necessary since the co-accused driver was already granted bail and the petitioner had no criminal antecedents, being implicated only on suspicion. Bail was allowed on condition of furnishing Rs. 4,000 bond with two sureties of Rs. 2,000 each, with requirements to cooperate with investigation and surrender within 15 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case