West Bengal State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. vs APURBA LAYEK — 28/2025

Case under Electricity Act Section 135(i)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--acquitted on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Electricity Act

CNR: WBBK010003692025

e-Filing Number

14-02-2025

Filing Number

226/2025

Filing Date

14-Feb-2025

Registration No

28/2025

Registration Date

14-Feb-2025

Court

Disrtrict and Sessions Judge, Bankura

Judge

4-ADJ III

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--acquitted

Last updated 02-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

6

Police Station

MEJHIA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Electricity Act Section 135(i)(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.West Bengal State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd.

    Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.APURBA LAYEK

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Special (Electricity Act) Court at Bankura acquitted accused Apurba Layek after the electricity offense was validly compounded by the competent authority (Zonal Manager, WBSEDCL) on 18.09.2025 and full payment was made as per Section 152 of the Electricity Act, 2003. The case was disposed of with the accused's immediate release, as the prosecution raised no objection to the compounding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ III

  4. 28-Oct-2025

    OrderView PDF

  5. 28-Oct-2025

    Charge / Plea Hearing

    ADJ III

  6. 15-May-2025

    Charge / Plea Hearing

    ADJ III

  7. 04-Mar-2025

    OrderView PDF

  8. 04-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 14-Feb-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 28/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Special (Electricity Act) Court at Bankura acquitted accused Apurba Layek after the electricity offense was validly compounded by the competent authority (Zonal Manager, WBSEDCL) on 18.09.2025 and full payment was made as per Section 152 of the Electricity Act, 2003. The case was disposed of with the accused's immediate release, as the prosecution raised no objection to the compounding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case