Varsha and Co proprietorship concern run and managed by Renuka Prasad vs Steel Authority of India Limited — 12/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Section 9. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.
Money Suit (Commercial)
CNR: WBBD170000442025
e-Filing Number
25-08-2025
Filing Number
122/2025
Filing Date
30-Aug-2025
Registration No
12/2025
Registration Date
30-Aug-2025
Court
Asansol Commercial Court
Judge
1-Judge Commercial Court
Last updated 21-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Varsha and Co proprietorship concern run and managed by Renuka Prasad
Adv. ARIJITA GHOSH
Respondent(s)
-
1.Steel Authority of India Limited
-
2.METAL JUNCTION / BUY JUNCTION
Case History
-
04-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-Apr-2026
Short orderView PDF
Summary: In this commercial money suit (WS 12/2025), the court adjourned the matter to 04/06/2026 for hearing and appearance of defendant No.1. Defendant No.2 filed a written statement and an application under Section 8 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, both of which were placed on record. The adjournment was granted in the interest of justice, considering the Bar Association's request and judicial constraints due to SIR duties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Apr-2026
Hearing
Judge Commercial Court
-
09-Mar-2026
Short orderView PDF
-
09-Mar-2026
Written Statement
Judge Commercial Court
-
27-Jan-2026
Short orderView PDF
-
27-Jan-2026
Written Statement
Judge Commercial Court
-
08-Dec-2025
Short orderView PDF
-
08-Dec-2025
Sr/Ad/Appearence
Judge Commercial Court
-
12-Sep-2025
Short orderView PDF
-
12-Sep-2025
DC Fees
Judge Commercial Court
-
30-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 12/2025
Summary: In this commercial money suit (WS 12/2025), the court adjourned the matter to 04/06/2026 for hearing and appearance of defendant No.1. Defendant No.2 filed a written statement and an application under Section 8 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, both of which were placed on record. The adjournment was granted in the interest of justice, considering the Bar Association's request and judicial constraints due to SIR duties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts