Reeshab and Co proprietorship concern run and managed by Dhurub Prasad vs Steel Authority of India Limited — 11/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Section 9. Status: Apperance. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.
Money Suit (Commercial)
CNR: WBBD170000432025
e-Filing Number
25-08-2025
Filing Number
121/2025
Filing Date
30-Aug-2025
Registration No
11/2025
Registration Date
30-Aug-2025
Court
Asansol Commercial Court
Judge
1-Judge Commercial Court
Last updated 21-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Reeshab and Co proprietorship concern run and managed by Dhurub Prasad
Adv. Krishnendu Mukhopadhyay
Respondent(s)
-
1.Steel Authority of India Limited
Case History
-
04-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-Apr-2026
Short orderView PDF
Case Summary Money Suit (Commercial) – 11/2025 | Commercial Court, Asansol The case was adjourned to 04/06/2026 for next appearance. The plaintiff appeared before the court, but the defendant took no steps. The court, noting the Bar Association's request and considering that judges are engaged in additional SIR duties, decided to adjourn the matter in the interest of justice without passing any adverse orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Apr-2026
Apperance
Judge Commercial Court
-
09-Mar-2026
Short orderView PDF
-
09-Mar-2026
Apperance
Judge Commercial Court
-
27-Jan-2026
Short orderView PDF
-
27-Jan-2026
Apperance
Judge Commercial Court
-
08-Dec-2025
Short orderView PDF
-
08-Dec-2025
Sr/Ad/Appearence
Judge Commercial Court
-
12-Sep-2025
Short orderView PDF
-
12-Sep-2025
DC Fees
Judge Commercial Court
-
30-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 11/2025
Case Summary Money Suit (Commercial) – 11/2025 | Commercial Court, Asansol The case was adjourned to 04/06/2026 for next appearance. The plaintiff appeared before the court, but the defendant took no steps. The court, noting the Bar Association's request and considering that judges are engaged in additional SIR duties, decided to adjourn the matter in the interest of justice without passing any adverse orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts