SMT PAYEL BAURI vs TAPAS BAURI — 851/2021

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498A,506,323,406,34. Status: app. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

app Next hearing 18-Jun-2026 this date has passed

Complaint Case

CNR: WBBD160189522021

Filing Number

18951/2021

Filing Date

08-Jul-2021

Registration No

851/2021

Registration Date

08-Jul-2021

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate, Asansol, Burdwan

Judge

9-CJM

Last updated 21-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 498A,506,323,406,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SMT PAYEL BAURI

    Adv. RAJESH KHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.TAPAS BAURI

Case History

  1. 18-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    app

    CJM

  3. 29-Oct-2025

    app

    CJM

  4. 14-Jun-2023

    Examination of Sa

    CJM

  5. 01-Dec-2022

    Examination of Sa

    CJM

  6. 24-Mar-2022

    Examination of Sa

    CJM

  7. 03-Dec-2021

    Examination of Sa

    CJM

  8. 18-Sep-2021

    Examination of Sa

    CJM

  9. 16-Aug-2021

    Examination of Sa

    CJM

  10. 08-Jul-2021

    short orderView PDF

    Summary: The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Paschim Bardhaman allowed the petition filed by Smt. Payel Bauri against Tapas Bauri and 4 others under Section 156(3) of CrPC. The court found the allegations require investigation and directed the Officer-in-Charge of Jamuria Police Station to treat the complaint as an FIR and initiate investigation into charges under IPC sections 498A, 506, 323, 406, 34 and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The police station was ordered to submit a compliance report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  11. 08-Jul-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 08-Jul-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 851/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Paschim Bardhaman allowed the petition filed by Smt. Payel Bauri against Tapas Bauri and 4 others under Section 156(3) of CrPC. The court found the allegations require investigation and directed the Officer-in-Charge of Jamuria Police Station to treat the complaint as an FIR and initiate investigation into charges under IPC sections 498A, 506, 323, 406, 34 and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The police station was ordered to submit a compliance report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case