State Of W.B. vs SUBHASH BHUINYA AND 10 ORS — 2562/2017
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498A,406,497,120B,34. Status: Argument / Further Argument. Next hearing: 07th July 2026.
G.R. CASE
CNR: WBBD160091312017
Filing Number
2562/2017
Filing Date
20-Dec-2018
Registration No
2562/2017
Registration Date
20-Dec-2018
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Asansol, Burdwan
Judge
9-CJM
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Of W.B.
Adv. sanjay shaw
Respondent(s)
-
1.SUBHASH BHUINYA AND 10 ORS
Case History
-
07-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
16-Mar-2026
Argument / Further Argument
CJM
-
30-Jan-2026
Argument / Further Argument
CJM
-
19-Sep-2025
Argument / Further Argument
CJM
-
11-Nov-2024
Argument / Further Argument
CJM
-
20-Sep-2023
Argument / Further Argument
CJM
-
08-Feb-2023
Argument / Further Argument
CJM
-
31-Jan-2023
short orderView PDF
In GR:2562/2017, the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Paschim Bardhaman examined three prosecution witnesses on 31.01.2023, who were cross-examined and discharged. The court closed the prosecution's evidence and adjourned the case to 08.02.2023 for accused examination under Section 313 CrPC and arguments, with all 11 accused persons required to be present. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
31-Jan-2023
Argument / Further Argument
CJM
-
16-Dec-2022
Argument / Further Argument
CJM
-
03-Jan-2022
Commitment
CJM
-
29-Jun-2021
Commitment
CJM
-
22-Mar-2021
Commitment
CJM
-
24-Feb-2021
Commitment
CJM
-
22-Jul-2020
Commitment
CJM
-
04-Feb-2020
Commitment
CJM
-
16-Aug-2019
Commitment
CJM
-
25-Jun-2019
Commitment
CJM
-
03-Apr-2019
Commitment
CJM
-
21-Dec-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Dec-2018
Case filed
Registration No. 2562/2017
In GR:2562/2017, the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Paschim Bardhaman examined three prosecution witnesses on 31.01.2023, who were cross-examined and discharged. The court closed the prosecution's evidence and adjourned the case to 08.02.2023 for accused examination under Section 313 CrPC and arguments, with all 11 accused persons required to be present. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts