WEST BENGAL vs DILIP GHOSH S/O- BHIKHHAR GHOSH — 196/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,354,447,448,506,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 24th March 2026.
G.R. CASE
CNR: WBBD160052652026
Filing Number
5265/2026
Filing Date
16-Mar-2026
Registration No
196/2026
Registration Date
16-Mar-2026
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Asansol, Burdwan
Judge
9-CJM
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 16-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
56
Police Station
JAMURIA
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.WEST BENGAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.DILIP GHOSH S/O- BHIKHHAR GHOSH
-
2.ALOK GHOSH S/O- BHIKKHAR GHOSH
Adv. null
-
3.SAMIR GHOSH S/O- DILIP GHOSH
-
4.NAMITA GHOSH W/O- DILIP GHOSH
-
5.CHAINA GHOSH W/O- ALOK GHOSH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
JudgementView PDF
Case Summary: West Bengal v. Dilip Ghosh & Others (GR 196/2026) The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Asansol acquitted all five accused persons (Dilip Ghosh, Alok Ghosh, Samir Ghosh, Namita Ghosh, and Chaina Ghosh) of charges under IPC Sections 323/341/506/34 (wrongful restraint, assault, and criminal intimidation). The complainant testified that the January 2022 incident arose from a misunderstanding, the dispute was settled outside court, and he had no objection to acquittal; corroborating witness testimony similarly indicated parties had reconciled. Finding the prosecution failed to prove charges beyond reasonable doubt due to the complainant's retraction and lack of support, the court discharged all accused and released them from bail bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
CJM
-
16-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 196/2026
Case Summary: West Bengal v. Dilip Ghosh & Others (GR 196/2026) The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Asansol acquitted all five accused persons (Dilip Ghosh, Alok Ghosh, Samir Ghosh, Namita Ghosh, and Chaina Ghosh) of charges under IPC Sections 323/341/506/34 (wrongful restraint, assault, and criminal intimidation). The complainant testified that the January 2022 incident arose from a misunderstanding, the dispute was settled outside court, and he had no objection to acquittal; corroborating witness testimony similarly indicated parties had reconciled. Finding the prosecution failed to prove charges beyond reasonable doubt due to the complainant's retraction and lack of support, the court discharged all accused and released them from bail bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts