State of West Bengal vs Biswajit Kumar Ray ALIAS Yadav — 188/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),3(5),329(4),351(2),75. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 20th April 2026.

Case disposed

G.R. CASE

CNR: WBBD160048282026

e-Filing Number

02-08-2025

Filing Number

4828/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

188/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate, Asansol, Burdwan

Judge

9-CJM

Decision Date

20-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 21-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

102

Police Station

RANIGANJ

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),3(5),329(4),351(2),75

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of West Bengal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Biswajit Kumar Ray ALIAS Yadav

  2. 2.Kusum Yadav@Kusum Devi

  3. 3.Raju Yadav S/O- RISHU YADAV

    Adv. null

  4. 4.BISHAL KUMAR RAY@YADAV

    Adv. null

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Asansol acquitted all four accused persons (Biswajit Kumar Ray, Kusum Yadav, Raju Yadav, and Bishal Kumar Ray Yadav) of charges under sections 351(2)/115(2)/75/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The prosecution witnesses—the complainant and alleged victims—failed to corroborate the FIR allegations of assault and outraging modesty, instead testifying that the case was lodged due to misunderstanding and had been amicably settled outside court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    CJM

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 188/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Asansol acquitted all four accused persons (Biswajit Kumar Ray, Kusum Yadav, Raju Yadav, and Bishal Kumar Ray Yadav) of charges under sections 351(2)/115(2)/75/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The prosecution witnesses—the complainant and alleged victims—failed to corroborate the FIR allegations of assault and outraging modesty, instead testifying that the case was lodged due to misunderstanding and had been amicably settled outside court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case