GRIHUM HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED vs ANIRBAN MUKHERJEE AND 01 ORS — 77/2025

Case under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act Section 14. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed

Misc Case

CNR: WBBD160035722025

Filing Number

3572/2025

Filing Date

28-Feb-2025

Registration No

77/2025

Registration Date

28-Feb-2025

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate, Asansol, Burdwan

Judge

9-CJM

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act Section 14

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GRIHUM HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED

    Adv. QAFIA FIRDOUS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ANIRBAN MUKHERJEE AND 01 ORS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    short orderView PDF

    Case Summary: 77/2025 The court dismissed the case filed by Grihum Housing Finance Limited against Anirban Mukherjee for non-prosecution on 14.05.2026. The petitioner failed to appear on the scheduled hearing date without taking any steps, did not file the required show-cause, and despite repeated opportunities, remained reluctant to proceed with the case. The respondent was released from the case and any interim orders were recalled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-May-2026

    Disposed

    CJM

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Show Cause

    CJM

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Show Cause

    CJM

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    Show Cause

    CJM

  7. 19-Dec-2025

    Show Cause

    CJM

  8. 09-Sep-2025

    Hearing

    CJM

  9. 06-May-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 28-Feb-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 77/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 77/2025 The court dismissed the case filed by Grihum Housing Finance Limited against Anirban Mukherjee for non-prosecution on 14.05.2026. The petitioner failed to appear on the scheduled hearing date without taking any steps, did not file the required show-cause, and despite repeated opportunities, remained reluctant to proceed with the case. The respondent was released from the case and any interim orders were recalled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case