The State of West Bengal vs Bharamar Das and — 1730/2017
Case under I.p.c Section 447,354,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 07th April 2026.
Gr Case
CNR: WBBD120026992017
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2675/2017
Filing Date
30-10-2017
Registration No
1730/2017
Registration Date
30-10-2017
Court
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kalna, Burdwan
Judge
8-JM
Decision Date
07th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
407
Police Station
MONTESWAR
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of West Bengal
Respondent(s)
Bharamar Das and
Hearing History
Judge: 8-JM
Disposed
Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-03-2026 | Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C | |
| 06-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 04-03-2025 | Evidence | |
| 20-08-2024 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court, Kalna acquitted Bhramar Das and four others of charges under IPC Sections 447 (criminal trespass), 354 (outraging modesty), and 34 (common intention), finding the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. Key weaknesses included: hearsay testimony from witnesses who weren't present at the alleged incident, material contradictions regarding the time of occurrence, absence of the only independent witness's corroboration, lack of medical or physical evidence, and evidence of prior enmity between parties suggesting possible false implication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court, Kalna acquitted Bhramar Das and four others of charges under IPC Sections 447 (criminal trespass), 354 (outraging modesty), and 34 (common intention), finding the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. Key weaknesses included: hearsay testimony from witnesses who weren't present at the alleged incident, material contradictions regarding the time of occurrence, absence of the only independent witness's corroboration, lack of medical or physical evidence, and evidence of prior enmity between parties suggesting possible false implication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts