The State of West Bengal vs Kajimaha Rafikujjaman @ Kaji Mahammad Jamal — 1225/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,504,506. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 11th March 2026.

Gr Case

CNR: WBBD120021772024

Case disposed

Filing Number

2177/2024

Filing Date

28-02-2023

Registration No

1225/2024

Registration Date

01-07-2024

Court

Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kalna, Burdwan

Judge

6-ACJM

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

104

Police Station

MONTESWAR

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 341,323,504,506

Petitioner(s)

The State of West Bengal

Adv. P.P

Respondent(s)

Kajimaha Rafikujjaman @ Kaji Mahammad Jamal

Hearing History

Judge: 6-ACJM

11-03-2026

Disposed

20-02-2026

Argument / Further Argument

09-02-2026

Evidence

25-03-2025

Evidence

01-07-2024

Appearance

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
COPY OF ORDER

The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kalna acquitted the accused Kaji Maha Rafikujjaman of charges under IPC sections 341/323/504/506 (wrongful restraint, voluntarily causing hurt, insulting speech, and criminal intimidation). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the complainant (PW-1) testified that the matter was amicably settled and he had no grievance against the accused, while the corroborating witness (PW-2) supported this account. The court held that suspicion cannot replace proof and acquitted the accused accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

01-07-2024
COPY OF ORDER
25-03-2025
COPY OF ORDER
casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kalna acquitted the accused Kaji Maha Rafikujjaman of charges under IPC sections 341/323/504/506 (wrongful restraint, voluntarily causing hurt, insulting speech, and criminal intimidation). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the complainant (PW-1) testified that the matter was amicably settled and he had no grievance against the accused, while the corroborating witness (PW-2) supported this account. The court held that suspicion cannot replace proof and acquitted the accused accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kalna, Burdwan All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case