The State of West Bengal vs Buddhadeb Barui — 791/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,325,506,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 09th April 2026.
Gr Case
CNR: WBBD120018612023
Filing Number
1861/2023
Filing Date
10-Aug-2023
Registration No
791/2023
Registration Date
10-Aug-2023
Court
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kalna, Burdwan
Judge
8-Jm
Decision Date
09-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 14-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
478
Police Station
KALNA
Year
2012
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The State of West Bengal
Adv. P.P
Respondent(s)
-
1.Buddhadeb Barui
-
2.Sankar Barui
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Apr-2026
JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court in Kalna, Purba Bardhaman acquitted accused Sankar Barui of charges under Sections 341, 323, 325, and 506 IPC (wrongful restraint, hurt, grievous hurt, and criminal intimidation). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, as the complainant and all three prosecution witnesses did not substantiate the allegations, with the informant himself stating he does not recall the incident and the parties having amicably settled their monetary dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Apr-2026
Disposed
Jm
-
11-Mar-2026
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
11-Mar-2026
Argument / Further Argument
Jm
-
17-Jan-2026
Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C
Jm
-
14-Jan-2026
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
14-Jan-2026
Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C
Jm
-
11-Feb-2025
Evidence
Jm
-
28-Mar-2024
Evidence
Jm I
-
18-Aug-2023
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
18-Aug-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Aug-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 791/2023
Case Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court in Kalna, Purba Bardhaman acquitted accused Sankar Barui of charges under Sections 341, 323, 325, and 506 IPC (wrongful restraint, hurt, grievous hurt, and criminal intimidation). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, as the complainant and all three prosecution witnesses did not substantiate the allegations, with the informant himself stating he does not recall the incident and the parties having amicably settled their monetary dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts