The State of West Bengal vs Laxman Santra and five others. Advocate - Ahijit Roy — 55/2020
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 448,323,504,506,188,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 07th March 2026.
Gr Case
CNR: WBBD120007262019
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
726/2019
Filing Date
11-03-2019
Registration No
55/2020
Registration Date
08-01-2020
Court
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kalna, Burdwan
Judge
6-ACJM
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
627
Police Station
KALNA
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of West Bengal
Adv. Apurba Das
Respondent(s)
Laxman Santra and five others. Advocate - Ahijit Roy
Sadhan Santra
Bidhan Santra
Anima Santra
Madan Santra
Subho Santra
Hearing History
Judge: 6-ACJM
Disposed
Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C
Evidence
Charge / Plea Hearing
Appearance and Death Report
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 17-02-2026 | Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C | |
| 24-04-2025 | Evidence | |
| 29-10-2024 | Charge / Plea Hearing | |
| 05-09-2024 | Appearance and Death Report |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kalna acquitted all five accused persons (Sadhan Santra, Bidhan Santra, Anima Santra, Madan Santra, and Subho Santra) of charges under IPC sections 448/323/504/506/188/34, finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that the key prosecution witness (PW-1) testified the matter was settled amicably and held no grievance against the accused, and that suspicion cannot replace proof. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kalna acquitted all five accused persons (Sadhan Santra, Bidhan Santra, Anima Santra, Madan Santra, and Subho Santra) of charges under IPC sections 448/323/504/506/188/34, finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that the key prosecution witness (PW-1) testified the matter was settled amicably and held no grievance against the accused, and that suspicion cannot replace proof. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts