The State of West Bengal vs Subhankar Das Adhikary — 259/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),126(2),3(5),351(2). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 02nd April 2026.

Gr Case

CNR: WBBD120004432026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

05-02-2026

Filing Number

443/2026

Filing Date

05-02-2026

Registration No

259/2026

Registration Date

05-02-2026

Court

Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kalna, Burdwan

Judge

6-ACJM

Decision Date

02nd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

218

Police Station

NADANGHAT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),126(2),3(5),351(2)

Petitioner(s)

The State of West Bengal

Respondent(s)

Subhankar Das Adhikary

Sagar Das Adhikary

Adv. null

Mukul Das Adhikari@Sucheta Das Adhikari

Adv. null

Hearing History

Judge: 6-ACJM

02-04-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

Argument / Further Argument

09-02-2026

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

02-04-2026
JUDGMENT

The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kalna acquitted all three accused persons (Subhanka Das Adhikary, Sagar Das Adhikary, and Mukul Das Adhikary) of charges under Sections 126(2)/115(2)/351(2)/3(5) of BNS, finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that the complainant herself testified the matter was settled amicably and harbored no grievance against the accused, while the second witness had no knowledge of the case, rendering the evidence insufficient to establish guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

09-02-2026
Charge Order
casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kalna acquitted all three accused persons (Subhanka Das Adhikary, Sagar Das Adhikary, and Mukul Das Adhikary) of charges under Sections 126(2)/115(2)/351(2)/3(5) of BNS, finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that the complainant herself testified the matter was settled amicably and harbored no grievance against the accused, while the second witness had no knowledge of the case, rendering the evidence insufficient to establish guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kalna, Burdwan All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case