The State of West Bengal vs Subhankar Das Adhikary — 259/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),126(2),3(5),351(2). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 02nd April 2026.

Case disposed

Gr Case

CNR: WBBD120004432026

e-Filing Number

05-02-2026

Filing Number

443/2026

Filing Date

05-Feb-2026

Registration No

259/2026

Registration Date

05-Feb-2026

Court

Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kalna, Burdwan

Judge

6-Acjm

Decision Date

02-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 14-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

218

Police Station

NADANGHAT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),126(2),3(5),351(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State of West Bengal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Subhankar Das Adhikary

  2. 2.Sagar Das Adhikary

    Adv. null

  3. 3.Mukul Das Adhikari@Sucheta Das Adhikari

    Adv. null

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Apr-2026

    JudgmentView PDF

    The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kalna acquitted all three accused persons (Subhanka Das Adhikary, Sagar Das Adhikary, and Mukul Das Adhikary) of charges under Sections 126(2)/115(2)/351(2)/3(5) of BNS, finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that the complainant herself testified the matter was settled amicably and harbored no grievance against the accused, while the second witness had no knowledge of the case, rendering the evidence insufficient to establish guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Acjm

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Argument / Further Argument

    Acjm

  5. 09-Feb-2026

    Charge OrderView PDF

  6. 09-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 05-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 259/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kalna acquitted all three accused persons (Subhanka Das Adhikary, Sagar Das Adhikary, and Mukul Das Adhikary) of charges under Sections 126(2)/115(2)/351(2)/3(5) of BNS, finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that the complainant herself testified the matter was settled amicably and harbored no grievance against the accused, while the second witness had no knowledge of the case, rendering the evidence insufficient to establish guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case