The State of West Bengal vs Pintu Dhak — 89/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 3(5),351(2),115(2),126(2). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

Gr Case

CNR: WBBD120001782026

e-Filing Number

17-01-2026

Filing Number

178/2026

Filing Date

17-Jan-2026

Registration No

89/2026

Registration Date

17-Jan-2026

Court

Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kalna, Burdwan

Judge

6-Acjm

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

398

Police Station

KALNA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 3(5),351(2),115(2),126(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State of West Bengal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Pintu Dhak

  2. 2.Khuku Dhak

    Adv. null

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    JudgmentView PDF

    Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kalna, acquitted Pintu Dhawk and Khuku Dhawk of charges under BNS sections 126(2)/351(2)/115(2)/3(5) for allegedly assaulting and threatening the complainant. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the complainant herself testified the matter was amicably settled and she had no grievance against the accused. Key prosecution witnesses did not support the case, leaving only suspicion without conclusive evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Acjm

  4. 20-Jan-2026

    Charge OrderView PDF

  5. 20-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 17-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 89/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kalna, acquitted Pintu Dhawk and Khuku Dhawk of charges under BNS sections 126(2)/351(2)/115(2)/3(5) for allegedly assaulting and threatening the complainant. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the complainant herself testified the matter was amicably settled and she had no grievance against the accused. Key prosecution witnesses did not support the case, leaving only suspicion without conclusive evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case