Shankari Debnath vs Dipak Debnath — 462/2024
Case under Hindu Marriage Act Section 13B. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on mutual consent on 07th March 2026.
Matrimonial Suit
CNR: WBBD110009812024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
587/2024
Filing Date
22-11-2024
Registration No
462/2024
Registration Date
22-11-2024
Court
Additional District and Sessions Judge, Kalna, Burdwan
Judge
2-ADJ FTC
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Allowed on mutual consent
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shankari Debnath
Adv. SAFI ASIF RAHAMAN
Respondent(s)
Dipak Debnath
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADJ FTC
Disposed
Hearing of Petition
Hearing of Petition
Hearing of Petition
Hearing of Petition
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-02-2026 | Hearing of Petition | |
| 18-12-2025 | Hearing of Petition | |
| 19-09-2025 | Hearing of Petition | |
| 20-08-2025 | Hearing of Petition |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court, Kalna granted a mutual divorce petition filed by Shankari Debnath (Das) and Dipak Debnath under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The court found that the parties, married on 02-04-2021, developed irreconcilable misunderstandings and temperamental differences, living separately since 20-10-2023, and that reconciliation efforts had failed. The marriage was dissolved with effect from the date of decree, and each party was ordered to bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court, Kalna granted a mutual divorce petition filed by Shankari Debnath (Das) and Dipak Debnath under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The court found that the parties, married on 02-04-2021, developed irreconcilable misunderstandings and temperamental differences, living separately since 20-10-2023, and that reconciliation efforts had failed. The marriage was dissolved with effect from the date of decree, and each party was ordered to bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts