The State of West Bengal vs Kartick Das — 23/2019
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 376AB/511. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 28th April 2026.
SC Special Case - Sessions Case Spl
CNR: WBBD110007692019
Filing Number
329/2019
Filing Date
13-08-2019
Registration No
23/2019
Registration Date
13-08-2019
Court
Additional District and Sessions Judge, Kalna, Burdwan
Judge
1-ADJ
Decision Date
28th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of West Bengal
Adv. PP
Respondent(s)
Kartick Das
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADJ
Disposed
Judgement
Argument / Further Argument
Argument / Further Argument
Argument / Further Argument
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 21-04-2026 | Judgement |
| 11-03-2026 | Argument / Further Argument |
| 10-02-2026 | Argument / Further Argument |
| 08-01-2026 | Argument / Further Argument |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The Special Court (POCSO Act), Kalna acquitted accused Kartick Das of charges under Section 376AB/511 IPC and Section 6/12 of the POCSO Act. The court found significant discrepancies in prosecution witness testimonies—including contradictions about the father's presence at the incident, the victim's school enrollment, and failure to produce the investigating officer or corroborating witnesses. Additionally, the victim's medical examination was refused, leaving sexual assault unproven. The court concluded the prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary The Special Court (POCSO Act), Kalna acquitted accused Kartick Das of charges under Section 376AB/511 IPC and Section 6/12 of the POCSO Act. The court found significant discrepancies in prosecution witness testimonies—including contradictions about the father's presence at the incident, the victim's school enrollment, and failure to produce the investigating officer or corroborating witnesses. Additionally, the victim's medical examination was refused, leaving sexual assault unproven. The court concluded the prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts