APARNA HATI vs SHAH HOSSAIN MONDAL — 291/2024

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Status: Written Statement. Next hearing: 08th July 2026.

Written Statement Next hearing 08-Jul-2026 this date has passed

M A C C - M.A.C.C

CNR: WBBD010061002024

Filing Number

2087/2024

Filing Date

05-Dec-2024

Registration No

291/2024

Registration Date

05-Dec-2024

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Burdwan

Judge

5-ADJ IV

Last updated 14-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.APARNA HATI

    Adv. ARUP RATAN SARKAR

  2. 2.AVIK HATI

  3. 3.AYON HATI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHAH HOSSAIN MONDAL

  2. 2.ROYAL SUNDARAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD

Case History

  1. 08-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    ordersView PDF

    Summary: In MACC Case No. 291 of 2024, the Burdwan MACT court adjourned the case to 08.07.2026 for further proceedings. The Opposite Party/Owner failed to appear, while the Insurance company was granted additional time to file its written statement. The petitioner appeared before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Written Statement

    ADJ IV

  4. 23-Dec-2025

    ordersView PDF

  5. 23-Dec-2025

    Written Statement

    ADJ IV

  6. 22-Aug-2025

    ordersView PDF

  7. 22-Aug-2025

    Written Statement

    ADJ IV

  8. 15-May-2025

    ordersView PDF

  9. 15-May-2025

    Written Statement

    ADJ IV

  10. 13-Mar-2025

    ordersView PDF

  11. 13-Mar-2025

    Written Statement

    ADJ IV

  12. 10-Jan-2025

    ordersView PDF

  13. 10-Jan-2025

    Written Statement

    ADJ IV

  14. 05-Dec-2024

    ordersView PDF

  15. 05-Dec-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  16. 05-Dec-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 291/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In MACC Case No. 291 of 2024, the Burdwan MACT court adjourned the case to 08.07.2026 for further proceedings. The Opposite Party/Owner failed to appear, while the Insurance company was granted additional time to file its written statement. The petitioner appeared before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case