State of West Bengal vs Bhakto Mondal — 6/2025
Status: Production. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
Spl Case - Spacial Case
CNR: WBBD010052692025
Filing Number
3344/2025
Filing Date
07-Apr-2025
Registration No
6/2025
Registration Date
25-Nov-2025
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Burdwan
Judge
2-ADJ I
Last updated 14-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
212
Police Station
BURDWAN (SADAR)
Year
2024
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of West Bengal
Respondent(s)
-
1.Bhakto Mondal
-
2.Subrata Das
-
3.Sk Enamul Haque
-
4.Niva Mondal@Niva Majhi
-
5.Sanjit Dey
-
6.Pinaki Biswas
-
7.Ramananda Chatterjee
-
8.Sayantan Ray
-
9.Pranab Kumar Ghosh
-
10.Monojit Sen
-
11.Sk Enamul Haque
-
12.Bhakta Mondal
Case History
-
17-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
08-May-2026
ordersView PDF
Case Summary Bail Denied. The Additional Sessions Judge, Burdwan rejected the bail petition of Bhakto Mondal, a University of Burdwan employee accused of misappropriating Rs. 1,93,89,876 in government funds through forgery and fraud involving multiple co-accused. The court found a strong prima facie case establishing the accused as a kingpin in this large-scale economic offense and rejected the parity argument since other accused persons had different roles. The case is adjourned to 17.06.2026 for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
Production
ADJ I
-
23-Apr-2026
ordersView PDF
-
23-Apr-2026
Put Up
ADJ I
-
11-Mar-2026
ordersView PDF
-
11-Mar-2026
Production
ADJ I
-
30-Jan-2026
ordersView PDF
-
30-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Apr-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 6/2025
Case Summary Bail Denied. The Additional Sessions Judge, Burdwan rejected the bail petition of Bhakto Mondal, a University of Burdwan employee accused of misappropriating Rs. 1,93,89,876 in government funds through forgery and fraud involving multiple co-accused. The court found a strong prima facie case establishing the accused as a kingpin in this large-scale economic offense and rejected the parity argument since other accused persons had different roles. The case is adjourned to 17.06.2026 for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts