State of West Bengal vs MADHUSUDAN MONDAL@MUNDA AND 03 OTHERS — 267/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379,411,413,414,120B. Status: appearance. Next hearing: 22nd July 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: WBBD010037412024
Next Hearing
22nd July 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2231/2024
Filing Date
02-08-2024
Registration No
267/2024
Registration Date
03-08-2024
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Burdwan
Judge
1-District Judge
FIR Details
FIR Number
1331
Police Station
BURDWAN (SADAR)
Year
2017
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of West Bengal
Respondent(s)
MADHUSUDAN MONDAL@MUNDA AND 03 OTHERS
RAHUL SK
DILIP HALDAR
RAJAB ALI SK
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge
appearance
appearance
appearance
appearance
appearance
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | appearance | |
| 17-09-2025 | appearance | |
| 05-05-2025 | appearance | |
| 10-12-2024 | appearance | |
| 09-08-2024 | appearance |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court cancelled the bail bonds of all four accused persons (Madhusudan Mondal @ Munda, Rahul Sk., Dilip Haldar, and Rajab Ali) in Sessions Case No. 267 of 2024 due to their repeated absence on consecutive court dates despite directions to appear. Non-bailable warrants were issued against all accused persons immediately, with the case adjourned to 22.07.2026 for execution of warrants. The court directed that proceedings under Section 491 of B.N.S.S. be initiated against the sureties for their failure to ensure the accused's appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court cancelled the bail bonds of all four accused persons (Madhusudan Mondal @ Munda, Rahul Sk., Dilip Haldar, and Rajab Ali) in Sessions Case No. 267 of 2024 due to their repeated absence on consecutive court dates despite directions to appear. Non-bailable warrants were issued against all accused persons immediately, with the case adjourned to 22.07.2026 for execution of warrants. The court directed that proceedings under Section 491 of B.N.S.S. be initiated against the sureties for their failure to ensure the accused's appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts