NILRATAN MAJI AND ANOTHER. vs State of West Bengal — 351/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBBD010008782026

Filing Number

545/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

351/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Burdwan

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED

Last updated 14-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NILRATAN MAJI AND ANOTHER.

    Adv. ATANU SARKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of West Bengal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    ordersView PDF

    Summary: The Sessions Judge, Purba Bardhaman, granted anticipatory bail to Nilratan Maji and Mamata Maji under Section 482 B.N.S.S. in a case involving allegations under Sections 126(2)/118(2)/3(5) B.N.S. The court found that custodial interrogation was unnecessary given the minor nature of injuries (victim discharged same day) and circumstances suggesting false implication. The accused were granted bail on furnishing bonds of Rs. 3,000 each with two sureties of Rs. 1,500 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 25-Feb-2026

    ordersView PDF

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 351/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Sessions Judge, Purba Bardhaman, granted anticipatory bail to Nilratan Maji and Mamata Maji under Section 482 B.N.S.S. in a case involving allegations under Sections 126(2)/118(2)/3(5) B.N.S. The court found that custodial interrogation was unnecessary given the minor nature of injuries (victim discharged same day) and circumstances suggesting false implication. The accused were granted bail on furnishing bonds of Rs. 3,000 each with two sureties of Rs. 1,500 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case