SANDIP DHAK vs State of West Bengal — 322/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBBD010008082026

Filing Number

498/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

322/2026

Registration Date

23-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Burdwan

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 10-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANDIP DHAK

    Adv. SK. JAHIR ABBAS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of West Bengal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    ordersView PDF

    SUMMARY: The Sessions Judge rejected Sandip Dhak's anticipatory bail application under Section 482 BNSS in a case involving charges under BNS Sections 126(2), 74, 76, 351(2), and 3(5). The court found that custodial interrogation of the petitioner was immediately necessary based on the nature of allegations, his role, and circumstances revealed in the case documents, despite the petitioner's arguments of false implication and two co-accused being released on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 23-Feb-2026

    ordersView PDF

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 322/2026

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The Sessions Judge rejected Sandip Dhak's anticipatory bail application under Section 482 BNSS in a case involving charges under BNS Sections 126(2), 74, 76, 351(2), and 3(5). The court found that custodial interrogation of the petitioner was immediately necessary based on the nature of allegations, his role, and circumstances revealed in the case documents, despite the petitioner's arguments of false implication and two co-accused being released on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case