STATE vs PRASENJIT BAURI AND TWO OTHERS — 66/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 302,120B. Status: Charge / Plea Hearing. Next hearing: 22nd July 2026.

Charge / Plea Hearing Next hearing 22-Jul-2026 this date has passed

Sessions Case

CNR: WBBB090002032024

Filing Number

1421/2024

Filing Date

05-Aug-2024

Registration No

66/2024

Registration Date

16-Aug-2024

Court

Additional District Judge, Dubrajpur, Birbhum

Judge

1-ADJ Ftc

Last updated 14-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

36

Police Station

KANKARTALA

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 302,120B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE

    Adv. App

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRASENJIT BAURI AND TWO OTHERS

  2. 2.Bholanath Mondal

  3. 3.Raja Singha@Biswajit Singha

Case History

  1. 22-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The case scheduled for consideration of charge was adjourned as one of the three accused persons was absent and requested additional time through his advocate. The court allowed the adjournment request in the interest of justice. The matter has been fixed for 22.07.26 for framing of charge with mandatory appearance of all accused persons on that date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Charge / Plea Hearing

    ADJ Ftc

  4. 11-Dec-2025

    OrderView PDF

  5. 11-Dec-2025

    Charge / Plea Hearing

    ADJ Ftc

  6. 19-Aug-2025

    OrderView PDF

  7. 19-Aug-2025

    Charge / Plea Hearing

    ADJ Ftc

  8. 29-Apr-2025

    OrderView PDF

  9. 29-Apr-2025

    Charge / Plea Hearing

    ADJ Ftc

  10. 10-Feb-2025

    OrderView PDF

  11. 10-Feb-2025

    Charge / Plea Hearing

    ADJ Ftc

  12. 09-Dec-2024

    OrderView PDF

  13. 09-Dec-2024

    Charge / Plea Hearing

    ADJ Ftc

  14. 21-Aug-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  15. 05-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 66/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The case scheduled for consideration of charge was adjourned as one of the three accused persons was absent and requested additional time through his advocate. The court allowed the adjournment request in the interest of justice. The matter has been fixed for 22.07.26 for framing of charge with mandatory appearance of all accused persons on that date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case