Jaly Begum vs Marfat ALi — 590/2024

Case under The Code of Criminal Procedure (West Bengal Amendment) Act, 1988 Section 144(3). Status: payment. Next hearing: 06th April 2026.

payment Next hearing 06-Apr-2026 this date has passed

Misc. Execution Case

CNR: WBBB060033942024

Filing Number

3391/2024

Filing Date

26-Nov-2024

Registration No

590/2024

Registration Date

26-Nov-2024

Court

Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rampurhat, Birbhum

Judge

9-Jm II

Last updated 14-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

The Code of Criminal Procedure (West Bengal Amendment) Act, 1988 Section 144(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Jaly Begum

    Adv. Samsul Alam

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Marfat ALi

Case History

  1. 06-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    payment

    Jm II

  3. 03-Feb-2026

    payment

    Jm II

  4. 03-Jan-2026

    payment

    Jm II

  5. 02-Dec-2025

    payment

    Jm II

  6. 28-Oct-2025

    Copy of Order/JudgmentView PDF

    Summary: In Misc Ex case no. 194/2024 (Rampurhat, Birbhum), the Judicial Magistrate's order dated 28.10.2025 dismissed the case for non-prosecution. The petitioner's application for payment of Rs. 3,000/- was allowed, but the case was subsequently dismissed due to the petitioner and her advocate's repeated absence despite strict warnings and non-compliance with procedural requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 28-Oct-2025

    payment

    Jm II

  8. 28-Oct-2025

    Restored

    Jm II

  9. 28-Oct-2025

    Disposed

    Jm II

  10. 10-Sep-2025

    show cause filing

    Jm II

  11. 13-Aug-2025

    payment

    Jm II

  12. 14-Jul-2025

    payment

    Jm II

  13. 13-Jun-2025

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    Jm II

  14. 14-May-2025

    Sr/Ad/Appearence

    Jm II

  15. 11-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  16. 26-Nov-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 590/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Misc Ex case no. 194/2024 (Rampurhat, Birbhum), the Judicial Magistrate's order dated 28.10.2025 dismissed the case for non-prosecution. The petitioner's application for payment of Rs. 3,000/- was allowed, but the case was subsequently dismissed due to the petitioner and her advocate's repeated absence despite strict warnings and non-compliance with procedural requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case