State Of West Bengal vs PRASHANTA PAL — 430/2025

Case under Explosive Substances Act Section 3/4. Status: Charge / Plea Hearing. Next hearing: 15th May 2026.

Charge / Plea Hearing Next hearing 15-May-2026 this date has passed

Sessions Case

CNR: WBBB010038592025

Filing Number

2679/2025

Filing Date

17-Dec-2025

Registration No

430/2025

Registration Date

17-Dec-2025

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Suri, Birbhum

Judge

1-District Judge

Last updated 22-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

310

Police Station

SURI

Year

2019

Acts & Sections

Explosive Substances Act Section 3/4
Indian Penal Code Section 448,325,354B,506,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Of West Bengal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRASHANTA PAL

  2. 2.BHABATARAN PAL

  3. 3.RAJKUMAR PAL

  4. 4.GOBINDA BAGDI

Case History

  1. 15-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Case Summary Sessions Case 430 of 2025, Court of Sessions Judge, Birbhum The case was adjourned to 15.05.2026 for appearance of accused persons and consideration of charge. One accused (Gobinda Bagdi) was granted time on petition, while three other court-bailed accused remained absent without taking any steps. No adverse orders were passed due to a Bar Association resolution and the PO's compliance with Supreme Court directions on SIR duty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Charge / Plea Hearing

    District Judge

  4. 20-Jan-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  5. 20-Jan-2026

    Appearence

    District Judge

  6. 19-Dec-2025

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  7. 19-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 17-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 430/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Sessions Case 430 of 2025, Court of Sessions Judge, Birbhum The case was adjourned to 15.05.2026 for appearance of accused persons and consideration of charge. One accused (Gobinda Bagdi) was granted time on petition, while three other court-bailed accused remained absent without taking any steps. No adverse orders were passed due to a Bar Association resolution and the PO's compliance with Supreme Court directions on SIR duty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case