State Of West Bengal vs SK KARIBUL — 103/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,149,419,420,467,468,471,307,506,120B. Status: Charge / Plea Hearing. Next hearing: 10th July 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: WBBB010035912024
Next Hearing
10th July 2026
Filing Number
2303/2024
Filing Date
13-11-2020
Registration No
103/2025
Registration Date
27-03-2025
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Suri, Birbhum
Judge
2-ADJ 1
FIR Details
FIR Number
74
Police Station
SADAIPUR
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Of West Bengal
Adv. MALOY MUKHERJEE
Respondent(s)
SK KARIBUL
SK AZIM
NUR ALAM KHAN
SAKABUL @ SIKABUL CHOWDHURY
SK HABOL @ SK AJIBUL @ SK TAJIBUL
SK FAJAL
SK SAMIR
SK MUKUL
SK NOYAN @ SK NAYAN
NUR AFSAR @ NUR ABSAR KHAN
SK ENAMUL
SK ALIM
SK ENAM
SK KAMAL
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADJ 1
Charge / Plea Hearing
Charge / Plea Hearing
Charge / Plea Hearing
appear before transferee court
Appearence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Charge / Plea Hearing |
| 25-11-2025 | Charge / Plea Hearing |
| 17-07-2025 | Charge / Plea Hearing |
| 26-06-2025 | appear before transferee court |
| 03-06-2025 | Appearence |
Interim Orders
Summary: In Sessions Case 103 of 2025 (CNR-WBBB01-003591-2025), the Additional Sessions Judge, 1st Court, Suri, Birbhum, adjourned the case to 10.07.2026 for appearance and consideration of charge. All 13 accused persons remain on court bail; 9 were present and 4 (Sk Azim, Sk Samir, Sk Kamal, and Sk Habol) were granted time through their petition for absence. The adjournment was necessitated due to the Regular Prosecution Officer being engaged in hearing Special Investigation Report matters as per Supreme Court direction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In Sessions Case 103 of 2025 (CNR-WBBB01-003591-2025), the Additional Sessions Judge, 1st Court, Suri, Birbhum, adjourned the case to 10.07.2026 for appearance and consideration of charge. All 13 accused persons remain on court bail; 9 were present and 4 (Sk Azim, Sk Samir, Sk Kamal, and Sk Habol) were granted time through their petition for absence. The adjournment was necessitated due to the Regular Prosecution Officer being engaged in hearing Special Investigation Report matters as per Supreme Court direction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts