CHAITRI SANNYASI vs SUBRATA SANNYASI — 321/2025

Case under Hindu Marriage Act Section 13B. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED IN TERMS OF COMPROMISE on 22nd April 2026.

Case disposed

Matrimonial Suit

CNR: WBBB010030312025

Filing Number

1001/2025

Filing Date

25-Sep-2025

Registration No

321/2025

Registration Date

25-Sep-2025

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Suri, Birbhum

Judge

4-ADJ 3

Decision Date

22-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DECREED IN TERMS OF COMPROMISE

Last updated 14-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Hindu Marriage Act Section 13B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHAITRI SANNYASI

    Adv. KRISHENDU GOSWAMI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUBRATA SANNYASI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 22-Apr-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary of Court Decisions This document contains 7 mutual divorce decrees from Birbhum District Courts (2016-2026), all granting divorces under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act 1955 and Section 28 of the Special Marriage Act 1954. In each case, the court found that parties had lived separately for over one year, reconciliation attempts failed, and their consent to divorce was free and voluntary without coercion or fraud. All decrees took effect immediately. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 22-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ 3

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing of Petition

    ADJ 3

  6. 13-Feb-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  7. 13-Feb-2026

    Appearence

    ADJ 3

  8. 12-Nov-2025

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  9. 12-Nov-2025

    Appearence

    ADJ 3

  10. 25-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 25-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 321/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Court Decisions This document contains 7 mutual divorce decrees from Birbhum District Courts (2016-2026), all granting divorces under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act 1955 and Section 28 of the Special Marriage Act 1954. In each case, the court found that parties had lived separately for over one year, reconciliation attempts failed, and their consent to divorce was free and voluntary without coercion or fraud. All decrees took effect immediately. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case