RAMKRISHNA DAS BAIRAGYA vs JHUMA DAS BAIRAGYA — 289/2025

Case under Hindu Marriage Act Section 13B. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED IN TERMS OF COMPROMISE on 02nd May 2026.

Case disposed

Matrimonial Suit

CNR: WBBB010025882025

Filing Number

867/2025

Filing Date

25-Aug-2025

Registration No

289/2025

Registration Date

25-Aug-2025

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Suri, Birbhum

Judge

4-ADJ 3

Decision Date

02-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DECREED IN TERMS OF COMPROMISE

Last updated 14-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Hindu Marriage Act Section 13B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMKRISHNA DAS BAIRAGYA

    Adv. SANGHAMITRA GHOSHAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JHUMA DAS BAIRAGYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-May-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The court granted a mutual divorce decree under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act 1955 to Ramkrishna Das Bairagya and Jhuma Das Bairagya, who had been married since 2010 and living separately for over one year. The judge found that both parties had given free, voluntary consent without coercion or fraud, the mandatory six-month waiting period had elapsed, and reconciliation attempts had failed, thereby dissolving their marriage effective immediately. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-May-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ 3

  4. 30-Apr-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  5. 30-Apr-2026

    Appearence

    ADJ 3

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  7. 11-Mar-2026

    Appearence

    ADJ 3

  8. 22-Sep-2025

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  9. 22-Sep-2025

    Appearence

    ADJ 3

  10. 25-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 25-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 289/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted a mutual divorce decree under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act 1955 to Ramkrishna Das Bairagya and Jhuma Das Bairagya, who had been married since 2010 and living separately for over one year. The judge found that both parties had given free, voluntary consent without coercion or fraud, the mandatory six-month waiting period had elapsed, and reconciliation attempts had failed, thereby dissolving their marriage effective immediately. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case