PRIYANKA DAS vs SUBODH BAYEN — 247/2025

Case under Hindu Marriage Act Section 13B. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on consent on 20th April 2026.

Case disposed

Matrimonial Suit

CNR: WBBB010022242025

Filing Number

770/2025

Filing Date

21-Jul-2025

Registration No

247/2025

Registration Date

21-Jul-2025

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Suri, Birbhum

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

20-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Allowed on consent

Last updated 14-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Hindu Marriage Act Section 13B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRIYANKA DAS

    Adv. MD. JIAUR RAHAMAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUBODH BAYEN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The District Judge of Birbhum granted a mutual consent divorce decree under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, dissolving the marriage between Priyanka Das and Subodh Bayen. The court found that the couple's marriage had irretrievably broken down due to irreconcilable differences in temperament, taste, and habits, with no possibility of reconciliation, and determined there was no collusion in their joint divorce application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Reconciliation

    District Judge

  6. 10-Feb-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  7. 10-Feb-2026

    Reconciliation

    District Judge

  8. 27-Jan-2026

    Reconciliation

    District Judge

  9. 25-Aug-2025

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  10. 25-Aug-2025

    Reconciliation

    District Judge

  11. 21-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 21-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 247/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The District Judge of Birbhum granted a mutual consent divorce decree under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, dissolving the marriage between Priyanka Das and Subodh Bayen. The court found that the couple's marriage had irretrievably broken down due to irreconcilable differences in temperament, taste, and habits, with no possibility of reconciliation, and determined there was no collusion in their joint divorce application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case