IMAJUDDIN SK ALIAS AMAI SEKH vs State Of West Bengal — 275/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED/Granted on 07th April 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBBB010007622026

Filing Number

512/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

275/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Suri, Birbhum

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

07-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED/Granted

Last updated 22-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

132

Police Station

RAMPURHAT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.IMAJUDDIN SK ALIAS AMAI SEKH

    Adv. SIB SUNDAR BANERJEE

  2. 2.REJAUL SEKH ALIAS SENTU SK

  3. 3.DIPU SEKH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Of West Bengal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Apr-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary The Sessions Judge, Birbhum granted anticipatory bail to three petitioners (Imajuddin Sk, Rejaul Sekh, and Dipu Sekh) in a case involving charges under BNS sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109(1), and 3(5). The court found that medical reports showed no injuries supporting section 109 charges, investigation had stalled since February 23, 2026, and there was no evidence of absconding risk or tampering likelihood. Each petitioner was granted bail of Rs. 3,000 with two sureties of Rs. 1,500 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  5. 30-Mar-2026

    Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition

    District Judge

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 275/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sessions Judge, Birbhum granted anticipatory bail to three petitioners (Imajuddin Sk, Rejaul Sekh, and Dipu Sekh) in a case involving charges under BNS sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109(1), and 3(5). The court found that medical reports showed no injuries supporting section 109 charges, investigation had stalled since February 23, 2026, and there was no evidence of absconding risk or tampering likelihood. Each petitioner was granted bail of Rs. 3,000 with two sureties of Rs. 1,500 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case