JIYAUL ISLAM MOLLICK ALIAS SENTU MOLLICK ALIAS JIAUL ISLAM MOLLICK vs State Of West Bengal — 272/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 27th March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBBB010007592026

Filing Number

509/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

272/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Suri, Birbhum

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

27-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 22-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

68

Police Station

PAIKOR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JIYAUL ISLAM MOLLICK ALIAS SENTU MOLLICK ALIAS JIAUL ISLAM MOLLICK

    Adv. MD.NASIM AKHTAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Of West Bengal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Sessions Judge, Birbhum rejected the anticipatory bail application of Jiyaul Islam Mollick under Section 482 of BNSS in a case involving charges under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 110, and 351(2)(3) of BNS. The court found that since the investigation was incomplete and the petitioner's involvement could not be ruled out, granting bail would hamper the investigation process, necessitating custodial interrogation instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 272/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge, Birbhum rejected the anticipatory bail application of Jiyaul Islam Mollick under Section 482 of BNSS in a case involving charges under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 110, and 351(2)(3) of BNS. The court found that since the investigation was incomplete and the petitioner's involvement could not be ruled out, granting bail would hamper the investigation process, necessitating custodial interrogation instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case