State Of West Bengal vs Md Sahil alias Rana — 79/2025

Case under Dowry Prohibition Act Section 34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 07th April 2026.

Case disposed

Sessions Case

CNR: WBBB010007372025

Filing Number

472/2025

Filing Date

13-Mar-2025

Registration No

79/2025

Registration Date

13-Mar-2025

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Suri, Birbhum

Judge

3-ADJ 2

Decision Date

07-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 14-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

215

Police Station

MD BAZAR

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Dowry Prohibition Act Section 34
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 118(2),109,351(2),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Of West Bengal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Md Sahil alias Rana

  2. 2.Piya alias Sahanaz Khatun

  3. 3.Rina Khatun

  4. 4.Usha Begam

  5. 5.Raja Sk

  6. 6.Raju Sk

  7. 7.Abbas Sk

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary The court acquitted seven accused persons charged with cruelty and murder in a dowry death case, finding that the prosecution failed to prove its allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The key issue was that the dying declaration allegedly given by the victim with 95% burn injuries was unreliable—the complainant and other prosecution witnesses contradicted it by testifying the victim sustained accidental burn injuries while cooking, and the victim's own family admitted they pressured her to make statements against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ 2

  4. 02-Apr-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  5. 02-Apr-2026

    Argument / Further Argument

    ADJ 2

  6. 27-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  7. 27-Mar-2026

    Argument / Further Argument

    ADJ 2

  8. 18-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  9. 18-Mar-2026

    Argument / Further Argument

    ADJ 2

  10. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  11. 16-Mar-2026

    Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C

    ADJ 2

  12. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  13. 11-Mar-2026

    Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C

    ADJ 2

  14. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  15. 10-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    ADJ 2

  16. 21-Feb-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  17. 21-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    ADJ 2

  18. 20-Feb-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  19. 20-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    ADJ 2

  20. 17-Jan-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  21. 17-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    ADJ 2

  22. 16-Jan-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  23. 16-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    ADJ 2

  24. 28-Nov-2025

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  25. 28-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    ADJ 2

  26. 27-Nov-2025

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  27. 27-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    ADJ 2

  28. 11-Sep-2025

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  29. 11-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    ADJ 2

  30. 14-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    ADJ 2

  31. 01-Aug-2025

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  32. 01-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    ADJ 2

  33. 31-Jul-2025

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  34. 31-Jul-2025

    Charge / Plea Hearing

    ADJ 2

  35. 18-Jun-2025

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  36. 18-Jun-2025

    Charge / Plea Hearing

    ADJ 2

  37. 16-May-2025

    Charge / Plea Hearing

    ADJ 2

  38. 21-Apr-2025

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  39. 21-Apr-2025

    Charge / Plea Hearing

    ADJ 2

  40. 07-Apr-2025

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  41. 07-Apr-2025

    Charge / Plea Hearing

    ADJ 2

  42. 17-Mar-2025

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  43. 17-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  44. 13-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 79/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted seven accused persons charged with cruelty and murder in a dowry death case, finding that the prosecution failed to prove its allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The key issue was that the dying declaration allegedly given by the victim with 95% burn injuries was unreliable—the complainant and other prosecution witnesses contradicted it by testifying the victim sustained accidental burn injuries while cooking, and the victim's own family admitted they pressured her to make statements against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case