State Of West Bengal vs Md Sahil alias Rana — 79/2025
Case under Dowry Prohibition Act Section 34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 07th April 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: WBBB010007372025
Filing Number
472/2025
Filing Date
13-03-2025
Registration No
79/2025
Registration Date
13-03-2025
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Suri, Birbhum
Judge
3-ADJ 2
Decision Date
07th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
215
Police Station
MD BAZAR
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Of West Bengal
Respondent(s)
Md Sahil alias Rana
Piya alias Sahanaz Khatun
Rina Khatun
Usha Begam
Raja Sk
Raju Sk
Abbas Sk
Hearing History
Judge: 3-ADJ 2
Disposed
Argument / Further Argument
Argument / Further Argument
Argument / Further Argument
Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 02-04-2026 | Argument / Further Argument |
| 27-03-2026 | Argument / Further Argument |
| 18-03-2026 | Argument / Further Argument |
| 16-03-2026 | Examination under section 313 Cr.P.C |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted seven accused persons charged with cruelty and murder in a dowry death case, finding that the prosecution failed to prove its allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The key issue was that the dying declaration allegedly given by the victim with 95% burn injuries was unreliable—the complainant and other prosecution witnesses contradicted it by testifying the victim sustained accidental burn injuries while cooking, and the victim's own family admitted they pressured her to make statements against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The court acquitted seven accused persons charged with cruelty and murder in a dowry death case, finding that the prosecution failed to prove its allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The key issue was that the dying declaration allegedly given by the victim with 95% burn injuries was unreliable—the complainant and other prosecution witnesses contradicted it by testifying the victim sustained accidental burn injuries while cooking, and the victim's own family admitted they pressured her to make statements against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts