SUKUMAR BAGDI ALIAS SUKHO BAGDI vs State Of West Bengal — 261/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBBB010007362026

Filing Number

492/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

261/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Suri, Birbhum

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

96

Police Station

SURI

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUKUMAR BAGDI ALIAS SUKHO BAGDI

    Adv. SUBRATA DEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Of West Bengal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Copy of Order

    Case 261/2026 Summary: The Sessions Judge, Birbhum rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by Sukumar Bagdi @ Sukho Bagdi under Section 482 BNSS in connection with Suri PS Case No.96 of 2026, where he was charged under Sections 329(4), 115(2), 118(2), 351(2), and 3(5) BNS. The court found that investigation was ongoing, petitioner's involvement could not be ruled out, and granting bail risked hampering the investigation; considering the nature of the offence and victim's injury, the petition was dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 261/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 261/2026 Summary: The Sessions Judge, Birbhum rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by Sukumar Bagdi @ Sukho Bagdi under Section 482 BNSS in connection with Suri PS Case No.96 of 2026, where he was charged under Sections 329(4), 115(2), 118(2), 351(2), and 3(5) BNS. The court found that investigation was ongoing, petitioner's involvement could not be ruled out, and granting bail risked hampering the investigation; considering the nature of the offence and victim's injury, the petition was dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case