State Of West Bengal vs Gopal Das — 75/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 448,323,325,307,354,506,34. Status: Appearence. Next hearing: 06th May 2026.

Appearence Next hearing 06-May-2026 this date has passed

Sessions Case

CNR: WBBB010007162026

Filing Number

475/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

75/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Suri, Birbhum

Judge

1-District Judge

Last updated 22-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

230

Police Station

SAINTHIA

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 448,323,325,307,354,506,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Of West Bengal

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Gopal Das

  2. 2.Nibaran Das

  3. 3.Bandana Das

  4. 4.Susanta alias Shashnaka Das

  5. 5.Badhan alias Bodan Das

  6. 6.Bikram Das

  7. 7.Rasu Das

Case History

  1. 06-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 02-Apr-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary: In Sessions Case 75 of 2026 before the Birbhum Sessions Court, the case was adjourned to 06.05.2026. All seven accused persons were granted extension of bail on the same terms, with five present and two absent (permitted by petition). Sureties were directed to produce the accused on the next date, and the adjournment was necessitated by the Prosecution Officer's compliance with Supreme Court directions regarding SIR duty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Apr-2026

    Appearence

    District Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 75/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Sessions Case 75 of 2026 before the Birbhum Sessions Court, the case was adjourned to 06.05.2026. All seven accused persons were granted extension of bail on the same terms, with five present and two absent (permitted by petition). Sureties were directed to produce the accused on the next date, and the adjournment was necessitated by the Prosecution Officer's compliance with Supreme Court directions regarding SIR duty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case