SK MOTIUR RAHAMAN vs State Of West Bengal — 211/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED/Granted on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBBB010005992026

Filing Number

396/2026

Filing Date

21-Feb-2026

Registration No

211/2026

Registration Date

21-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Suri, Birbhum

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED/Granted

Last updated 14-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

199

Police Station

PANRUI

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SK MOTIUR RAHAMAN

    Adv. SOMENATH MUKHERJEE

  2. 2.FORIDA BIBI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Of West Bengal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Sessions Judge allowed the anticipatory bail application for petitioners Sk Motiur Rahaman and Forida Bibi, finding that the chargesheet had already been submitted, eliminating the need for custodial interrogation, and noting that co-accused were already on bail. The petitioners were granted bail of Rs. 5,000 each with two sureties of Rs. 2,500 each, subject to conditions including non-contact with the complainant and witnesses, appearance at trial dates, and restriction from leaving the court's territorial jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 21-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 21-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 211/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge allowed the anticipatory bail application for petitioners Sk Motiur Rahaman and Forida Bibi, finding that the chargesheet had already been submitted, eliminating the need for custodial interrogation, and noting that co-accused were already on bail. The petitioners were granted bail of Rs. 5,000 each with two sureties of Rs. 2,500 each, subject to conditions including non-contact with the complainant and witnesses, appearance at trial dates, and restriction from leaving the court's territorial jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case