RANJIT BAURI vs State Of West Bengal — 208/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED/Granted on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBBB010005922026

Filing Number

391/2026

Filing Date

20-Feb-2026

Registration No

208/2026

Registration Date

20-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Suri, Birbhum

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED/Granted

Last updated 14-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

32

Police Station

DUBRAJPUR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RANJIT BAURI

    Adv. SUKUMAR GHOSH

  2. 2.UDAY BAURI

  3. 3.RABINDRANATH DAS ALIAS RABINDRA DAS

  4. 4.LALTU BADYAKAR ALIAS LALTU DOM

  5. 5.BAPAN BADYAKAR

  6. 6.RAJKUMAR BAURI

  7. 7.SANJIT BAURI ALIAS KUTUI BAURI

  8. 8.NARESH BAURI

  9. 9.PRASENJIT BAURI ALIAS FACHUNG BAURI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Of West Bengal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Sessions Judge, Birbhum granted anticipatory bail to nine petitioners in a case involving charges under BNS sections 127(2), 132, 221, 121(1), 121(2), 3(5) and the Maintenance of Public Order Act. The court found no justification for custodial interrogation as investigation had stalled since February 13, 2026, co-accused were already on bail, injuries were simple, and there was no risk of absconding or evidence tampering. Each petitioner was released on bail of Rs. 3,000 with two sureties of Rs. 1,500 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 20-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 208/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge, Birbhum granted anticipatory bail to nine petitioners in a case involving charges under BNS sections 127(2), 132, 221, 121(1), 121(2), 3(5) and the Maintenance of Public Order Act. The court found no justification for custodial interrogation as investigation had stalled since February 13, 2026, co-accused were already on bail, injuries were simple, and there was no risk of absconding or evidence tampering. Each petitioner was released on bail of Rs. 3,000 with two sureties of Rs. 1,500 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case